Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. James Robert Axt
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
HECHT, Justice.
The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board filed a complaint alleging the respondent, James Axt, breached ethical rules by committing domestic abuse and defying a related no-contact order. The grievance commission found Axt’s conduct violated certain provisions of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct and recommended revocation of Axt’s law license. Having respectfully considered the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation of the commission, we find Axt committed ethical violations and conclude his license to practice law should be suspended for two…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. TempletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. CaseySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. HoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. ConradSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James A. Clarity IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard Scott RhinehartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Ronald L. RicklefsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Mary Ellen KennedySupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Peter Sean CannonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.