Legal Opinion
Flexfab, L.L.C. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 27, 2005No. 2005-5018PublishedCited by 168 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Flexfab, L.L.C. (“Flexfab”) appeals the ruling of the United States Court of Federal Claims on cross-motions for summary judgment that Flexfab was not an intended third-party beneficiary of a contract between Capital City Pipes, Inc. (“Capital City”), a now-insolvent contractor, and The Defense Logistics Agency, Defense Supply Center Columbus (“DSCC” or “government”), or in the alternative that Flexfab was not a direct party to an implied-in-fact contract with the government. See Flexfab, LLC v. United States, 62 Fed.Cl. 139 (2004). Because the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Fullilove v. KlutznickSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by168 opinions
- Sioux Honey Ass'n v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- PlanetSpace Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Liberty Ammunition, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Jumah v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Night Vision Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.