Legal Opinion
Pettit v. HAMPTON AND BEECH, INC.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 5, 2007No. AC 27156PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
The facts underlying this appeal concern the construction and sale of a new home. The plaintiffs, Larry Pettit and Bonnie Pettit, appeal from the judgment for money damages rendered in their favor, which they claim to be insufficient, following a trial to the court. The plaintiffs have raised nine claims on appeal, which we have grouped for purposes of analysis. The plaintiffs claim that the court (1) applied the wrong standard to determine whether there was substantial compliance with the contract, (2) improperly refused to apply General Statutes § 20-417a et seq., the New…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miller v. BourgoinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Edens v. Kole Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Suffield Development Associates Ltd. Partnership v. National Loan Investors, L.P.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Strobel v. StrobelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Strouth v. Pools by Murphy & Sons, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Flynn Builders, L.C. v. Matthew P. Lande and Chris LandeSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Sovereign Bank v. LicataConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Dubaldo Electric, LLC v. Montagno Construction, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Clem Martone Construction, LLC v. DepinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Beckenstein v. Reid and Riege, PCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.