Legal Opinion
In re Stanley D.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 26, 2000No. AC 20366PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPEAR, J.
The respondent father appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights1 with respect to his minor child, S, pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-112. The respondent’s sole claim is that the court improperly found that he had failed to achieve sufficient personal rehabilitation within the meaning of § 17a-112 (c) (3) (B).2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*226The following facts and procedural history are relevant to this appeal. After S’s birth, on November 17, 1994, his pediatrician immediately contacted the department of children and families…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In re Migdalia M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- In re Luis C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- In re Eden F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- In re Michael M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- In re Hector L.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In re Daniel C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- In re Ashley S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- In re Victoria B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- In re Kristy A.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- In re Latifa K.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.