Legal Opinion

Kirsch Holding Co. v. Borough of Manasquan

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 28, 1971No. A-135; A-140PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Hall, J.

These cases, consolidated for argument on appeal, concern the validity of essentially identical zoning ordinance provisions of the Boroughs of Manasquan and Belmar prohibiting, inter alia, the “group rental” of seasonal seashore resort living accommodations.

The property owner-parties in both cases had admittedly violated the ordinances. In the Manasquan ease (hereafter Kirsch) the action was in lieu of prerogative writ seeking a determination that the provisions were invalid and an injunction against their enforcement. The Law Division upheld…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Des Plaines v. TrottnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  2. MAYOR & CC OF BALTIMORE v. PoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  3. City of Long Beach v. California Lambda Chapter of Sigma Alpha Epsilon FraternityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. TAXPAYERS ASSN. OF WEYMOUTH TP. INC. v. Weymouth Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  3. State v. CameronSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. Brunetti v. Borough of New MilfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  5. State v. BakerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API