Legal Opinion

Linares v. Jones

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 28, 2008No. Civil Action 04-0247 (GK)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge.

This matter, arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and common law, is before the Court on the motion for partial summary-judgment as to Defendants Curtis Jones, Stanley Rembish, Charles Ramsey and William Farr. Upon consideration of the motion, Plaintiffs opposition, and the relevant parts of the record, the Court will grant Defendants’ motion in part and deny it in part.

I. BACKGROUND

This action arises from Plaintiffs encounter on January 3, 2002, with officers of the Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”). Plaintiff alleges that while entering his…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hargraves v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. Wesby v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Moore v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  4. Flythe v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  5. Roe v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API