Legal Opinion

Marion v. Grand Coulee Dam Hotel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1950No. 30998PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This is an action to recover damages because of alleged misrepresentations of the defendants in inducing the plaintiff to establish a dental office in Grand Coulee, Washington, and to lease office space from defendant corporation. A demurrer to plaintiff’s amended complaint was sustained and plaintiff having elected to stand upon that pleading, the trial court entered judgment of dismissal of the action from which plaintiff appealed.

The allegations of the complaint are in substance as follows: Respondent Grand Coulee Dam Hotel Co. is a Washington corporation and respondent Fred M. Weil is the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Southern Development Co. v. SilvaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Farrar v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Wooddy v. Benton Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Stewart v. LarkinWashington Supreme Court · 1913

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rummer v. ThroopWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. McKelvie v. HackneyWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Corbett v. TicktinWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Fleischman v. HockettWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Loehr v. ManningWashington Supreme Court · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API