Legal Opinion

McKelvie v. Hackney

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1961No. 35398, 35441PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

The two actions herein were consolidated for trial and again upon-appeal. Declaratory judgments and damages for fraud are- sought. They are concerned with' the Trinity Court Apartments (hereinafter referred to as the apartment house), which are located on Eighth avenue be? tween Jefferson and James .streets in Seattle.

In 1948, J.'L. Grandey owned two lots located at-the site in question. He planned to build an apartment house on one, and, for this purpose, incorporated Cherry Street Investment Co. (hereinafter referred to as Cherry' Street). He transferred one of the lots to Cherry Street in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. J. L. Cooper & Co. v. Anchor Securities Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Langley v. DevlinWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. State ex rel. Everett Trust & Savings Bank v. Pacific Waxed Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Marion v. Grand Coulee Dam HotelWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Tait v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McNeal v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Leonard v. Washington Employers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Annuity Board of Southern Baptist ConventionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  4. Nab v. HillsIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Locken v. LockenNevada Supreme Court · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API