Legal Opinion

Loehr v. Manning

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1954No. 32735PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.

— The vendees under a contract to purchase a farm brought this action to recover damages for misrepresentations in negotiating the sale. The vendors and a real-estate agent, together with the latter’s wife, were named defendants.

Plaintiffs alleged that defendants made the following misrepresentations, each of which had been relied upon by plaintiffs: (1) That the farm comprised forty-five acres of land, whereas it actually contained 37.76 acres; (2) that the farm had pastured fifty head of cattle and would probably support more than fifty head, whereas it would not support that many head of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wooddy v. Benton Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Hanson v. TompkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Salter v. HeiserWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Dixon v. MacGillivrayWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Arrowsmith v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bibow v. GerrardNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Asheim v. Pigeon Hole Parking, Inc.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1959
  3. Church at Seattle v. HendrixWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Polskie Linie Lotnicze Lot SA v. The Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API