Rummer v. Throop
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHamxey, J.
The vendees under a contract to purchase a farm brought this action to rescind for fraud. The complaint alleges that false representations, upon which the vendees relied, were made with respect to the size and productive capacity of the farm, the acreage seeded, freedom from weeds, and the harmless effect of magnesium oxide dust from a nearby industrial plant. The plaintiffs sought recovery of $8,200 paid on the purchase price and $8,575 as. consequential damages.
The vendors denied the principal allegations of the complaint. They also counterclaimed for recognition of their forfeiture of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
- Stewart v. LarkinWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Salter v. HeiserWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Mackay v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Cunningham v. Studio Theatre, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Rivers v. Washington State Conference of Mason ContractorsWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Rivers v. STATE CONF. OF MASON CONTRACTORSWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Skagit State Bank v. RasmussenWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- J. I. Case Credit Corp. v. StarkWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Franchey v. HannesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.