Legal Opinion

Harris v. Clinton

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 22, 1955PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBokdon, J.

The plaintiffs brought this action for specific performance as assignees of a written contract whereby the defendants agreed to convey a building lot in West Haven to Peter Horbiek, the plaintiffs’ assignor. The defendants pleaded by way of special defense that the written contract failed to state the true intent of the parties because, as an inducing consideration, Horbick had. agreed orally (1) not to assign his interest in the contract to any party without securing the defendants’ consent, (2) to use the stone upon the lot in. question to erect a dwelling house for himself and his family,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. State v. Chin LungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  2. Cohn v. DunnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  3. Horvath v. TontiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  4. Freund v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  5. Amellin v. LeoneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Panaroni v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Vogel v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  3. Damora v. Christ-JanerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Martino v. PalladinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  5. Engelke v. WheatleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API