Legal Opinion

Cohn v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 17, 1930No. (NO. 1393), (NO. 1396)PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

The only assignments of error pursued in the brief and oral argument of the defendant Sissa are those which complain of two rulings upon the admission of evidence, both of which involve substantially the same question. The defendant Dunn was asked upon his direct examination what if anything he said to Pellino with reference to construction mortgages upon lots five and six when he made the contract with him for the construction of the houses upon those lots. This evidence was offered by counsel for Sissa in support of the allegation in his cross-complaint that Pellino, before entering into…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McMahon v. PlumbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  2. Burns & Smith Lumber Co. v. DoyleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  3. Brosty v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  4. Siller v. PhilipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  5. Fernandez v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Dean v. HershowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Panaroni v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  4. Damora v. Christ-JanerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. HLO Land Ownership Associates Ltd. Partnership v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API