Legal Opinion
Martino v. Palladino
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 25, 1956PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The plaintiff brought an action to recover a broker’s commission for the sale of real estate. The case was tried to the jury and resulted in a verdict for the defendants. On the plaintiff’s motion the court set the verdict aside, and the defendants have appealed, assigning error in the granting of the plaintiff’s motion. Onr task is to review the court’s action.
A broker is entitled to his commission when he has procured a customer ready, able and willing to purchase upon terms prescribed or accepted by the seller. Thomas F. Rogers, Inc. v. Hochberg, 143 Conn. 22, 24, 118 A.2d 910. The burden…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Loomis v. Norman Printers Supply Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Zullo v. ZulloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Harris v. ClintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- State v. LaFountainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Silva v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Birgel v. HeintzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Desmarais v. PintoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Frankovitch v. BurtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Walsh v. TurlickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Kalleher v. OrrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.