Hogan v. City of Winston-Salem
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
Defendant City appeals from that part of the Order entered on 29 December 1994 granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment as to plaintiffs’ seventh cause of action and declaring that the 20 August 1990 Amendment to Chapter 15, Article II of the Retirement Code of the City of Winston-Salem is unconstitutional as applied to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs appeal from that part of the Order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to plaintiffs’ first, second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth causes of action.
The facts are as follows: Plaintiff was a sworn officer of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Amos v. Oakdale Knitting Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF MINNESOTA Ex Rel. THE CITY OF DULUTHSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Simpson v. North Carolina Local Government Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Faulkenbury v. Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Phillips v. JP Stevens & Co., Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Schimmeck v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Tripp v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Miracle v. North Carolina Local Government Employees Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Howse v. Bank of Am., N.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.