Legal Opinion
Miracle v. North Carolina Local Government Employees Retirement System
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided November 5, 1996No. COA94-1241PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals summary judgment entered in favor of defendants on plaintiff’s constitutional claims and claim for equitable estop-pel regarding termination of his retirement benefits. We affirm the trial court in part and reverse it in part.
Pertinent procedural and background information is as follows: Plaintiff began employment with Onslow County as a law enforcement officer in 1959. As such, he became a member of the Law Enforcement Officers’ Benefit and Retirement Fund, later designated as the Law Enforcement Officers’ Retirement System (LEO). See 1983 N.C. Sess. Laws ch.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Hughes v. Bd. of Trustees Teachers' & State Emps.' Ret. Sys.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
- Pendergraph v. N.C. Dep't of RevenueNorth Carolina Business Court · 2011
- Proctor v. LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEMCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009