Legal Opinion

Howse v. Bank of Am., N.A.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 15, 2017No. COA16-979PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGEE, Chief Judge.

*23 Richard Howse and Mary B. Reed ("Plaintiffs") appeal from the trial court's 5 May 2016 order granting Bank of America, N.A.'s ("Bank of America") and Federal National Mortgage Association's ("Fannie Mae") (collectively, "Defendants") motion for summary judgment, and denying Plaintiffs' motion to compel. We affirm in part, reverse and remand in part.

I. Background

Plaintiffs executed a promissory note ("the Note") in the principal amount of $376,000.00, made payable to Bank of America, on 16 July 2008. The Note was secured by a deed of trust (the "Deed of Trust") executed by…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Forbis v. NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Lowe v. BradfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert & HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Gaunt v. PittawayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Dallaire v. Bank of America, N.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2014

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Monroe v. Rex Hosp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  2. S. Coll. St., LLC v. Charlotte Sch. of Law, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2018
  3. Watson v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API