Legal Opinion

Aldrich v. Hinds

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 24, 1925No. 15152PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

This is an equitable proceeding brought to establish plaintiff’s right of inheritance to an undivided one-fourth interest in the lands allotted in the name of Ellis McGee after his death, for the benefit of his heirs, and for an accounting for the rents and profits.

Plaintiff presents her case in the brief under the single proposition that the only question to, be decided in the case is whether or not the cause of action of the plaintiff in error waA barred by the statute of limitations which was in force prior to statehood, being the 7-year limitation (of Arkansas).

On the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Mullen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Brader v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Howard v. ManningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Chancey v. WhinnerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coats v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Gustin v. CarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Bohanon's HeirsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Reed v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. Tower v. TowieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API