Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tower v. Towie

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 27, 1961No. 39143Published

1DissentHalley, Justice

With all due respect to the opinion of the majority in this case I am compelled to dissent. The rule of law laid down in the syllabus is incorrect as applied to couples co-habiting in the Indian Territory prior to 1890.

I cannot agree that the record shows a marriage according to Cherokee law of Nellie Smoke and Wilson Towie.

The purpose of the enrollment records was primarily to determine who were entitled to be enrolled as members of one of the Five Civilized Tribes, here the Cherokee Tribe. The record on Isaac Tower was that “The father of this boy seemed to be identified as Wilson Towie.”

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Aldrich v. HindsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API