Howard v. Manning
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Stephens County; Cham Jones, Judge. Action of attachment by R. A. Howard and J. C. Holden before a justice of the peace against H. B. Salmon to recover landlord’s portion ,of the crops as rent. J. R. Manning, defendant in error, intervened, claiming the rents under prior lease. The judgment of the trial court awarded Manning two-thirds of the rent and plaintiffs in error one-third.
1Opinion of the CourtRamsey, J.
R. A. Howard and J. C. Holden, plaintiffs in error, commenced this action against H. B. Salmon before a justice of the peace by filing their bill of particulars . and affidavit for attachment to recover as rent their part of the crops valued at one hundred fifty dollars and 95/100 ($150.95), alleged to be due them under an agricultural, lease made by them to A. Y. Moore, who in turn let the land to defendant, Salmon. The defendant in error intervened and alleges that he is entitled to recover the rents and profits, that the land was of the rental value of $3 per acre; and prays ‘ for judgment…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. GratiotSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Lewis v. Ocean Navigation & Pier Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Watford Oil & Gas Co. v. ShipmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Stewart v. TennantWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
- Raynolds v. HannaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1893
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Earp v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Buck v. Del City Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Sublett v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.