Legal Opinion

Coats v. Riley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 8, 1931No. 20454PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

This is ah appeal from a judgment of the district court of Hughes county in favor of the defendants in error and against the plaintiffs in error, adjudging that the plaintiffs in error have no right, title, or interest in and to the land involved in this action and enjoining them and each of them from asserting any right, title, or interest therein. A jury was waived and the cause was tried to the court.

For convenience, the plaintiffs in error hereinafter will be referred to as cross-petitioners, they having presented their claims to the land under a cross-petition, and the defendants in…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Clark v. Kansas City, St. Louis & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Daniel v. TolonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Independent Cotton Oil Co. v. BeachamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Flesher v. CallahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Bell v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Fipps v. StidhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Hassell v. Texaco, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. McGrath v. EichoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Caesar v. BurgessCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  5. Douglass v. MounceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API