Legal Opinion

Gustin v. Carshall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 5, 1932No. 20729PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Le Flore county in favor of the defendants in error, cross-petitioners in the trial court, against the plaintiff in error, the plaintiff in the trial court. Hereinafter the plaintiff in error will be referred to as the plaintiff and the defendants in error as the cross-petitioners.

The plaintiff commenced an action in the district court of Le Flore county to recover a judgment on certain promissory notes and to foreclose a real estate mortgage given as security therefor. The cross-petitioners were made defendants therein, and with…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Herbert v. WaggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Stewart v. BalderstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  3. Grentner v. FehrenschieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Fender, Adm'r v. SegroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Horrigan v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chapman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  2. McMillan v. Lane Wood & CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Richard v. RichardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Mills v. District Court of Lincoln CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Fulbright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API