Legal Opinion

Mycek v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 26, 1941PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The stipulated facts, in so far as they are relevant to the decisive legal issue, may be summarized as follows: F. H. Woodruff & Sons, seed growers, were the owners of seven trucks used in their business. Among them was the truck which caused the injury in this case. All of the trucks were covered by a liability policy issued by the defendant. This policy insured the owners and any additional assured under the usual omnibus clause 1 against damages resulting from the operation of the trucks. F. H. Wood-ruff & Sons employed many men in Connecticut, principally in Milford. Andrew Vargo was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stovall v. New York Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  3. Brower v. Employers' Liability Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Peterson v. MaloneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Drewek v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chatfield v. Farm Bureau Mut. Auto. Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
  2. Gulla v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Hooper v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Mt. Beacon Insurance Company v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1969
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. PadgettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API