Hooper v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtEbviN, J.
Omnibus or extended coverage clauses in policies of automobile liability insurance have provoked much litigation in other jurisdictions in cases where employees were driving motor vehicles belonging to their employers. Annotation: 5 A.L.R. (2d) 600-668. But diligent research by counsel and the Court fails to uncover any North Carolina decision directly pertinent to the problems posed by the plaintiff’s appeal. Since the present record makes these problems so fundamentally factual in nature, however, there is no occasion at this time for us to choose between the differing constructions put…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Laroche v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Hodges v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Stanley v. Cryer Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
- Brown v. KennedyOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Donovan v. Standard Oil Co. of LouisianaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Chatfield v. Farm Bureau Mut. Auto. Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
- Hughes Ex Rel. Hughes v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Columbia Casualty Co. v. HoohuliHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
- Hawley v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.