Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Padgett

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 3, 1955No. 6889PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOPER, Circuit Judge.

The decision in this case turns on the interpretation of the omnibus clause of an automobile policy issued to Boineau’s, Inc., a South Carolina corporation, wherein the following provision was made: “The unqualified word ‘insured’ includes the named insured and also includes any person while using an owned automobile or a hired automobile, and any person or organization legally responsible for the use thereof, provided the actual use of the automobile is by the named assured, or with his permission.” The policy covered an automobile truck that was involved in an accident…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stovall v. New York Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  4. American Auto. Ins. Co. v. FulcherCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
  5. Chatfield v. Farm Bureau Mut. Auto. Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Raymond L. Young v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
  2. Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc. v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
  3. Mason & Dixon Lines v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
  4. Young v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
  5. Young v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API