Legal Opinion

Gulla v. Reynolds

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1949No. 31457PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

Although there is little conflict in the evidence, the plaintiff requested the trial court to state in writing the conclusions of fact found separately from the conclusions of law. These are as follows:

“Findings of Fact
“The court finds: 1. That on July 16, 1946, a default judgment for $30,000 was rendered in favor of the plaintiff against Walter Reynolds for injuries and damage sustained October 11, 1944, when plaintiff was struck by a truck operated by Walter Reynolds.
“2. That said truck was the property of Bernard Straus and that Buckeye Union Casualty Company had issued a policy of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  2. Mycek v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Continental Insurance v. WhittingtonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Gulla v. StrausOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Erie Insurance Group v. FisherOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Protective Fire and Casualty Company v. CorneliusNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Weathers v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API