Legal Opinion

Hartigan v. Clark

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 1960No. Appeals, 144, 145, 146 and 147PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bok,

This case has been tried twice and was here on appeal from the grant of a new trial after the first one, at 389 Pa. 283 (1957), 133 A. 2d 181. Both trials resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $20,-000, and this time the verdict was allowed to stand. Defendant appealed when her motions for a new trial and for judgment n.o.r. were overruled.

There is a preliminary matter to cope with before we test the merits. Defendant filed, on December 9, 1959, a motion to amend the record to show that the verdict fee was paid and judgment entered on November 20,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Masciantonio WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Stadler v. Mt. Oliver BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Markman v. Fred P. Bell Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Chapman v. ClothierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Neve v. Insalaco'sSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Nixon v. NixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Radies v. Reading Liederkranz German Singing & Sport SocietySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Crawford v. Manhattan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Alida Rodriguez v. Mount Airy #1, LLC, d/b/a Mount Airy Casino ResortDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API