Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Manhattan Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1965No. Appeal, No. 237PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

This is an appeal from an order of the lower court in which it is “. . . ordered and decreed that judgment n.o.v. be entered in behalf of the defendant. . . .” This order does not enter judgment but, evidently, directs the prothonotary, or clerk of the court, to enter the formal judgment. Cf. Watkins v. Neff, 287 Pa. 202, 134 A. 625 (1926). The record in the present appeal reveals, however, that final judgment had not been entered when the appeal was taken nor at any time thereafter.

Our Supreme Court stated in Hartigan v. Clark, 401 Pa. 594, 602, 165 A. 2d 647, 651…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Watkins v. NeffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Hartigan v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Bodick v. Harcliff Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Kersey Manufacturing Co. v. RozicSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davanzo v. FinelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Nixon v. NixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Ludwig v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API