Crawford v. Manhattan Life Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
This is an appeal from an order of the lower court in which it is “. . . ordered and decreed that judgment n.o.v. be entered in behalf of the defendant. . . .” This order does not enter judgment but, evidently, directs the prothonotary, or clerk of the court, to enter the formal judgment. Cf. Watkins v. Neff, 287 Pa. 202, 134 A. 625 (1926). The record in the present appeal reveals, however, that final judgment had not been entered when the appeal was taken nor at any time thereafter.
Our Supreme Court stated in Hartigan v. Clark, 401 Pa. 594, 602, 165 A. 2d 647, 651…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Watkins v. NeffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Hartigan v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Bodick v. Harcliff Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Kersey Manufacturing Co. v. RozicSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davanzo v. FinelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Nixon v. NixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Ludwig v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1984