Legal Opinion
Northup v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 20, 1961PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The employer has appealed from a Superior Court judgment affirming the unemployment commissioner’s action in sustaining the administrator’s allowance of unemployment benefits to the plaintiff.
The facts are not disputed. The plaintiff is twenty-one years old and unmarried. He attends the Culinary Institute in New Haven from 8 a.m. to 2:40 p.m. From September, 1959, until February 10, 1960, he worked on the second shift, from 3:30 p.m. to 11:30 p.m., for Sargent and Company, the employer. On February 10, 1960, he was laid off the second shift owing to lack of work but was offered work on the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Waterbury Savings Bank v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Reger v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Leclerc v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Pacific Mills v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Farrar v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fusari v. SteinbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Texas Employment Commission v. HaysTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- DaSilva v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Dubkowski v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- American Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Clark & Fray Construction Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.