Legal Opinion

Dubkowski v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 6, 1963PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

For a number of years the three plaintiffs, who were skilled workers, had been employed at The Stanley Works in New Britain. Two of them were in labor grade 14, earning a minimum of $2.35 an hour, and the third was in labor grade 13, earning $2.25 an hour. In October, 1960, because of a slack in business, they were transferred to lower-rated jobs, at $1.90 an hour. On November 18, because of the continuance of the slack in business, all three were offered jobs, to commence the next workday, as sweepers in grade 11, at $1.69 an hour. The rate of pay offered for the new work was the prevailing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reger v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  2. Schettino v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  3. Leclerc v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. Pacific Mills v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  5. Hallahan v. RileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bayly Manufacturing Co. v. Department of EmploymentSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  2. In Re PotvinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
  3. Keystone Steel & Wire Division v. Department of LaborAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Johns-Manville v. Bd. of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  5. DaSilva v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API