Legal Opinion

Puritan Pharmaceutical Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to recover damages for the loss of three shipments of toilet preparations delivered by plaintiff to defendant at St. Louis to be transported to pier 22, New York City. Defendant, admitting the three shipments of toilet preparations, set up as a defense to the action that the shipments were seized by federal prohibition officers, and also set up a counterclaim for freight charges.

The trial, with a jury, resulted in a directed verdict for plaintiff on both plaintiff's cause of action and defendant's counterclaim. Judgment was given accordingly. Defendant appeals.

The action of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Husty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Milam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
  5. Peru v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Capra v. Phillips Investment CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. Zinn v. City of SteelvilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  3. McClaren v. G. S. Robins & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  4. State Ex Rel. Hand v. BilyeuMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Hammett v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API