Legal Opinion

Milam v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1924No. 2152PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODS, Circuit Judge.

There was a general verdict of guilty on an indictment containing four counts, each charging a separate conspiracy to conceal, harbor, transport, and convey persons of Chinese descent not.duly admitted into the United Statés by an immigration inspector, nor entitled to reside in the United States. The chinaman *630mentioned in the first count was'Moy Gong Chue, alias Lee Chu; in the second, Tong Yuen, alias Poy Jong; in the third, Gee Yuen, alias Toi Lock. In the fourth count 18 Chinamen were mentioned by name, including those mentioned in the first, second, and third counts.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gavieres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Downes v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. South Carolina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1845

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Carney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  4. Peru v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  5. Paper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API