Legal Opinion

Zinn v. City of Steelville

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 6, 1943No. 38167PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHyde, J.

This is an action to declare void an ordinance of the City of Steelville and to enjoin ils enforcement. Invalidity is claimed on constitutional grounds. The court entered a decree adjudging the ordinance valid and plaintiff has appealed.

The ordinance is as follows-: “Section 1. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, co-partnership or corporation, or the agent, servant, employees, or officers of any person, firm, co-partnership, or eorpoation to play or permit the playing of any piano', electric piano, phonograph, coin-in-the-slot-maehines, juke boxes, or any other kind of musical…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Kansas City v. J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  3. Bellerive Investment Co. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  4. Aden v. DaltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  5. Meyering v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kansas City v. LaRoseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  2. State v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. Capra v. Phillips Investment CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  4. ABC Liquidators, Inc. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. Lamere v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1945

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API