Legal Opinion

Hammett v. Kansas City

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 4, 1943No. 38363PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The named plaintiffs and others, for themselves and all others similarly situated, brought this cause against Kansas City, the mayor and other city officers, for a declaratory judgment upon the constitutional validity of ordinance No. 6977, and to enjoin enforcement. Defendants filed a general demurrer to the petition, were overruled, stood on the demurrer, and refused to plead further. The court adjudged the ordinance void, enjoined enforcement, and defendants appealed.

Section 2 of the ordinance follows: "That no license or permit provided for or required under any ordinance of Kansas [72]…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. BrowningSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Tappan v. Merchants' National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Hart Refineries v. HarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Ex Parte Keane v. StrodtmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brawner v. BrawnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Mashak v. PoelkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. Fisher v. State Highway Com'n of Mo.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  4. Kansas City v. WebbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  5. State ex rel. Conservation Commission v. LePageSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API