Peru v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KENYON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs in error were tried in the District Court of Nebraska, Omaha Division, upon an information in five counts charging violation of tlie federal law with reference to selling and possessing intoxicating liquor. Plaintiff in error, Dominick Peru, was convicted on all counts. Plaintiff in error, Anton Bird, was acquitted under direction of the court on the first four counts, and the jury returned a verdict of guilty on the fifth.
The facts are few and not intricate. Both Peru and Bird were employed in a fruit store in Omaha, which seems to have been owned by one…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Coverstone v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- DeSacia v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Davids v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
- Wisniewski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.