Legal Opinion

Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. McManigal

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1905No. 13,691PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to the district court for Douglas county: Guy R. O. Read, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Ames, C.

A bare outline of the facts will suffice for an understanding of the problems presented for solution in this case.

William Rogers was engaged as foreman of a company of laborers, one of whom was the plaintiff, in the demolition of a building belonging to the defendant railway company and standing on its right of way. It is alleged that in the construction of the building, fourteen years previously, there was a defect of a character affecting its stability to such a degree as to render it more easily destructible than it would otherwise have been, but it is not *581claimed that such alleged…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Gerner v. YatesNebraska Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Coca Cola Co. v. Pepsi-Cola Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1934
  2. Portland Gold Mining Co. v. Stratton's Independence, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. D. B. Loveman Co. v. BaylessTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Giedrewicz v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Williams v. HinesSupreme Court of Florida · 1920

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API