Legal Opinion

D. B. Loveman Co. v. Bayless

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1913PublishedCited by 53 opinions

PROM HAMILTON Appeal from the Circuit Court of Hamilton County. —N. L. Bachman, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil

*309Bayless, the defendant in error, sned the D. B. Love-man Company, a mercantile corporation, and two of its servants, D. B. Loveman, its president, and D. C. Seymour, its superintendent, in an action of damages, in ■the.circuit court of Hamilton county. The declaration contained eight counts, but presented only three distinct charges, false imprisonment, assault and battery, .and slander, all rooted in the same transaction, or .series of transactions. The defendants pleaded not .guilty to all of the counts, hut also interposed special pleas of justification as to the „ matter of slander…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. JopesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. McGinnis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. Portland Gold Mining Co. v. Stratton's Independence, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  5. Illinois Central Ry. Co. v. Murphy's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Abshure v. Methodist Healthcare-Memphis HospitalsTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Creech v. AddingtonTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Mullins v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Craven v. LawsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Johnson v. LeBonheur Children's Medical CenterTennessee Supreme Court · 2002

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API