Legal Opinion
Voss v. Johnson & Johnson
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 8, 2010No. Civil Nos. 06-3728 (JRT), 07-1862(JRT), 07-3960(JRT), 08-5743(JRT), 08-5745(JRT)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge.
The instant motions concern the cases of five plaintiffs (“Phase 1 Minnesota plaintiffs” or “plaintiffs”) whose actions have been consolidated with hundreds of other cases in this multidistrict litigation. Plaintiffs assert injuries resulting from the use of Levaquin, an antibiotic medication.
Defendants have filed substantively identical joint motions for partial judgment on the pleadings in the following cases: Schedin v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., Civil No. 08-5743 (D. Minn, filed Oct. 15, 2008) (Schedin Docket No. 19)1; Christensen v. Johnson & Johnson, et…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ashley County, Ark. v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Farr v. Armstrong Rubber CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Levaquin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010