Legal Opinion
Madeo v. I. Dibner & Brother, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 30, 1936PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The commissioner found that the claimant was suffering disability due to tuberculosis which she had contracted in the course of her employment by the defendants in their business of manufacturing women’s dresses; that the factory room in which she worked was badly crowded, her hours of employment were long, the conditions under which she worked were very unsanitary, and she had been exposed to the disease because of the fact that other employees with whom she was brought in contact were suffering from it; and that by reason of the conditions of her employment “she was exposed to infection in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Madore v. New Departure Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Glodenis v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Hines v. Norwalk Lock Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Rousu v. Collins Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- De La Pena v. Jackson Stone Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Matter of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Matter of Harman v. Republic Aviation Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Lelenko v. Wilson H. Lee Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Discuillo v. Stone & WebsterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.