Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. Land Mortgage & Title Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 8, 1932PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The plaintiff with her husband and children were tenants from month to month of the upper apartment of a two-tenement house on Preston Street in Hartford owned by the defendant. On the southwest corner of the house was an open verandah. In the middle of the south side of the verandah which was in the possession and exclusive control of' the plaintiff tenant, was a post carrying the verandah railing and extending and attached to the roof. On the outside of this post was a pulley which carried a clothes line to a tree in the yard. The roof of the verandah was of tin and around the outer edges…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mahoney v. BeatmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Reardon v. ShimelmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- State v. LeopoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Lindsey v. LeightonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Vinci v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lelenko v. Wilson H. Lee Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Corey v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Drible v. Village Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Figlar v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Fogarty v. M. J. Beuchler & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.