George McArthur & Sons, Inc. v. Safe-Play Manufacturing Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
LUONGO, District Judge.
Before me is the motion of defendants, Safe-Play Manufacturing Company, Safe-Play Sales Corporation, and Welded Tube Company of America, to amend their answers previously filed to include the defense of Statute of Limitations. The complaint to which the answers were filed alleges that defendants, pursuant to an agreement to manufacture hammocks for plaintiff, shipped some of the hammocks on plaintiff’s behalf to one of plaintiff’s customers. Plaintiff’s customer in turn sold one of the hammocks on June 20, 1955, to one of its own customers who, in using the hammock,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Emich Motors Corporation and U. S. Acceptance Corporation v. General Motors Corporation and General Motors Acceptance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- Frederick H. McNaughton v. The New York Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Bowles v. Biberman Bros.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1953
- Berg v. Remington Arms CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harvey v. Eimco Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- Eastridge v. Fruehauf Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1971
- Jones v. WatersDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983