Legal Opinion

Berg v. Remington Arms Company

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1962No. Civ. A. 30033PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUONGO, District Judge.

On December 26, 1952, defendant’s predecessor sold and delivered to Phoenix Supply Company a chain saw which it had manufactured. Thereafter (when and how is not revealed in the record) Phoenix Supply Company transferred the chain saw to Town Supply Company which, on May 25, 1960, rented it to plaintiff’s employer. On that date plaintiff was injured while using the chain saw. Plaintiff instituted suit against defendant on August 3, 1961 alleging as the basis for recovery a breach of the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for purpose. The complaint…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Jones v. Boggs & Buhl, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Rodebaugh v. Philadelphia Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. Woodland Oil Co. v. A. M. Byers & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Prince v. Trustees of University of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Conard v. StitzelDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Tackling v. Chrysler Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  4. Harvey v. Eimco Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Webster v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API