Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Biberman Bros.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 21, 1945No. 9009PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

The Administrator of the Office of Price Administration sued Biberman Bros., Inc., pursuant to Section 205(a) and (e) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 925(a) and (e), for injunctive relief and for treble damages. The Administrator alleges that Biberman, a manufacturer of dresses, violated Section 4(a) of the Act, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix § 904(a), because it failed to comply with Maximum Price Regulation No. 287, 7 F.R. 10460, as revised and amended.1 In substance the Administrator charges that Biberman sold dresses at prices in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Glick Bros. Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  2. Federal Deposit Ins. Corporation v. MasonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  3. Bowles v. FranceschiniCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
  4. Bowles v. Heinel Motors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Bowles v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Emich Motors Corporation and U. S. Acceptance Corporation v. General Motors Corporation and General Motors Acceptance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  3. Klee v. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Lawrence v. FuldDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
  5. Woods v. MertesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API