Legal Opinion

Husted v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1999No. 104447, Calendar No. 17PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

Henry Dobbs struck and killed plaintiffs decedent while driving his employer’s uninsured vehicle. Dobbs had a personal automobile insurance policy with defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company. This policy included an applicable business-use exclusion. We granted leave to determine whether the no-fault act’s residual liability coverage requirement voids this business-use exclusion under these circumstances. We conclude that the no-fault act does not require residual liability coverage for an insured’s operation of a vehicle that he does not own or has not registered and that is unambiguously…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Malcolm v. City of East DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RuuskaMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. Federated Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. NikkelMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. McDonald v. Farm Bureau InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Rental Properties Owners Ass'n v. Kent County TreasurerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Crown Technology Park v. D&N Bank, FSBMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. NullMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API