Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Farm Bureau Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 2008No. Docket 132218PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, C.J.

In this case, we must decide whether a contractual limitations period in an insurance policy is tolled from the time a claim is made until the insurance company denies the claim and, if it is not, whether the limitations period may be avoided under the doctrines of waiver or estoppel. Consistently with long-established contract law, we hold that there is no automatic tolling when a claim is filed unless the contract so provides. Traditional contract doctrines such as waiver and estoppel can apply when the facts support them. However, in the present case plaintiff has not shown that she relied…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Koontz v. Ameritech Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Western World Insurance Co. v. Mary ArmbrusterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. DeFRAIN v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANYMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Tenneco Inc. v. Amerisure Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Chelsea Investment Group LLC v. City of ChelseaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Johnson Family Ltd. Partnership v. White Pine Wireless, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API