Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. Federated Mutual Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, C.J.
These automobile insurance cases, consolidated for the purpose of appeal, involve the requirements of Michigan’s no-fault act, MCL 500.3101 et seq.; MSA 24.13101 et seq., and financial responsibility act, MCL 257.501 et seq.; MSA 9.2201 et seq., relative to vehicle ownership. In each case we are asked to decide the validity of a vehicle owner’s policy of liability insurance that denies coverage to any permissive user who is otherwise insured for an amount equal to that specified by the no-fault act. We hold that the vehicle owner’s policy at issue is invalid because it denies coverage for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RuuskaMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ShellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RuuskaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Snappy Car Rental, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. Federated Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
3Cited by38 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Enterprise Leasing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Corwin v. DaimlerChrysler InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- Husted v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Bowers v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1998
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.