Legal Opinion

Armentrout v. Murdock

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided October 12, 1989No. 01-88-00423-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MIRABAL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a dismissal for want of prosecution.

In six points of error, appellant, Joe Maurice Armentrout, contends that the trial court erred in dismissing the case, and in overruling appellant’s motion to reinstate.

The appellate standard of review of a dismissal for want of prosecution or the overruling of a motion to reinstate is whether there has been a clear abuse of discretion by the trial court. Moore v. Armour & Co., 748 S.W.2d 327, 329 (Tex.App. — Amarillo 1988, no writ); Speck v. Ford Motor Co., 709 S.W.2d 273, 276 (Tex. App. — Houston [14th Dist.]…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Veterans' Land Board of Texas v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. StootTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Moore v. Armour & Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1988
  4. Speck v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Degen v. General Coatings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Lynaugh, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
  2. Cappetta v. Hermes, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
  3. Olin Corp. v. Coastal Water Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  4. Brown v. Howeth Investments, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  5. Ellmossallamy v. HuntsmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API