Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Lynaugh

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided November 27, 1996No. 01-96-00377-CVPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHEN, Justice.

Appellant filed a pro se, informa pauperis action seeking review of disciplinary measures during his prison term. The district judge dismissed appellant’s case for want of prosecution. We affirm.

On September 14, 1989, appellant sued Lynaugh. More than four years later, the trial judge gave notice that the case was set for the October 1995 Civil Dismissal Docket:

This cause will be dismissed on OCTOBER 13, 1995, at 1:45 P.M., unless, prior to this date, request to retain said cause on the docket is made in writing to the Clerk, all [sic] per Rule 165a, T.R.C.P. Return of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Connecticut v. MayfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Veterans' Land Board of Texas v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Armstrong v. Randle, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994
  4. Johnson v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Armentrout v. Murdock, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Gibson v. TolbertTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Knie v. Piskun, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
  3. Hall v. Treon, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2001
  4. Wright v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
  5. Pitts v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API