Legal Opinion

Moore v. Armour & Co., Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided April 13, 1988No. 07-87-0112-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.

This appeal requires us to determine whether the trial court clearly abused its discretion in dismissing for want of prosecution, and refusing to reinstate, Johnny Moore’s personal injury action filed eighteen years earlier against Armour & Company, Inc. and its former employee, Joe Lee Browning. Concluding that the trial court did not clearly abuse its discretion, we will affirm the judgment of dismissal.

Our review of Moore’s appeal to challenge, with four points of error, the court’s exercise of discretion begins with the recognition that a trial court not only has…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. RotelloTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Bevil v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Veterans' Land Board of Texas v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Rizk v. MayadTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Denton County v. BrammerTexas Supreme Court · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Maida v. Fire Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Ozuna v. Southwest Bio-Clinical Laboratories, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Kendrick, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
  4. Manning v. North, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
  5. Eustice v. Grandy's, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API