Legal Opinion

Speck v. Ford Motor Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 20, 1986No. C14-85-660-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JUNELL, Justice.

Carlos Dale Speck and Amelia Speck appeal an order dismissing their lawsuit for want of prosecution. In their sole ground of error, appellants contend the trial court abused its discretion in denying their motion to reinstate and in overruling their motion for rehearing on the order , denying their motion to reinstate. Appellees Ford Motor Company and Southwest Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction under Rule 165a, Tex.R.Civ.Pro. We overrule the motion to dismiss and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Appellants bought a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. RotelloTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Bevil v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Butts v. Capitol City Nursing Home, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Metal Enterprises, Inc. v. Don Love, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ozuna v. Southwest Bio-Clinical Laboratories, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
  2. Goff v. Branch, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
  3. Eustice v. Grandy's, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  4. Rampart Capital Corporation v. MaguireTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Frenzel v. BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES, INC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API