Legal Opinion

In Re the Discipline of Isaacs

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 5, 1987No. C6-84-2215PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Following a hearing on a petition for disciplinary action, the referee appointed by this court recommended that attorney Clark F. Isaacs (“Isaacs”) be publicly reprimanded, that he be suspended from the practice of law for five years, and that the suspension be stayed on the following conditions:(a) That Respondent enter and successfully complete an in-patient chemical dependency program approved by the Minnesota Supreme Court.(b) That, upon completion of the in-patient chemical dependency program, Respondent continue participating in Alcoholics Anonymous and Lawyers Concerned for Lawyers.(c)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Action Against FrankeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. In Re Application for Discipline of HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Matter of Discipline of FlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. In Re the Discipline of ScallenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against JagielaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Matter of Discipline of SimonsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against PerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API